TFM
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2010
- Messages
- 575
Last week there was an article in one of the major dailies that the Ministry of Education was considering the changeover of 20 selected schools to a same-sex educational environment.
On March 20, Newsday ran the verdict that TTUTA had rejected the proposal based on certain factors such as lack of information and consultation, cosmetic coverup of deeper issues, and psychological and social effects (mainly on males).
I agree 100% with the lack of information and consultation because let's face it, our authorities implement systems without research and work out the kinks after, costing us time, money and effectiveness.
I also agree that this is just a scape-goat for the government to try and deal with the bigger issues of rampant indiscipline and falling standards at our nation's schools.
However, I do not agree with TTUTA's reasoning of the effects it will have on students.
General Secretary Peter Wilson said: "There are many other factors to be considered...classrooms and schools in general are not just for academics but also for socialization to prepare young people for society. We already have problems with both sexes relating to each other...when they come out of those same-sex environment would they be prepared for the world outside of the school?"
Are you kidding me? Since when was the education system so vetted in maintaining the social relationships between males and females. I thought school was for education, not to "look for man/woman". What "socialization" is Wilson talking about? As far as I know, its all about sex and relationships in these problem schools. Who could be the manlier man or the more popular girl. It has nothing to do with proper communication that could help them in their future careers.
It is well-known public knowledge that same-sex schools produce more scholarship winners than traditional schools, so then why is "socialization" always the determining factor in whether it is healthy or not? I highly doubt that if someone doesn't go to school with a girl, it means he won't talk to one in public.
I think it all comes down to our society's views on heterosexuality and what is "gay" and what is "normal". Because of the ideas we have cultivated among the youth (especially the males) of society, none of them want to go to a same-sex school because they will be chided by their peers and have their sexuality attacked and questioned.
He did go on to say that "there are other contributing factors such as students from those schools come from higher social standings" to which I agree, because when you grow up in a more educated and cultured environment, you tend to be more aware and less affected by archaic social stereotypes.
So my question to you guys is...Would you let your son, daughter, brother, sister go to a same-sex school? WHY or WHY NOT?
On March 20, Newsday ran the verdict that TTUTA had rejected the proposal based on certain factors such as lack of information and consultation, cosmetic coverup of deeper issues, and psychological and social effects (mainly on males).
I agree 100% with the lack of information and consultation because let's face it, our authorities implement systems without research and work out the kinks after, costing us time, money and effectiveness.
I also agree that this is just a scape-goat for the government to try and deal with the bigger issues of rampant indiscipline and falling standards at our nation's schools.
However, I do not agree with TTUTA's reasoning of the effects it will have on students.
General Secretary Peter Wilson said: "There are many other factors to be considered...classrooms and schools in general are not just for academics but also for socialization to prepare young people for society. We already have problems with both sexes relating to each other...when they come out of those same-sex environment would they be prepared for the world outside of the school?"
Are you kidding me? Since when was the education system so vetted in maintaining the social relationships between males and females. I thought school was for education, not to "look for man/woman". What "socialization" is Wilson talking about? As far as I know, its all about sex and relationships in these problem schools. Who could be the manlier man or the more popular girl. It has nothing to do with proper communication that could help them in their future careers.
It is well-known public knowledge that same-sex schools produce more scholarship winners than traditional schools, so then why is "socialization" always the determining factor in whether it is healthy or not? I highly doubt that if someone doesn't go to school with a girl, it means he won't talk to one in public.
I think it all comes down to our society's views on heterosexuality and what is "gay" and what is "normal". Because of the ideas we have cultivated among the youth (especially the males) of society, none of them want to go to a same-sex school because they will be chided by their peers and have their sexuality attacked and questioned.
He did go on to say that "there are other contributing factors such as students from those schools come from higher social standings" to which I agree, because when you grow up in a more educated and cultured environment, you tend to be more aware and less affected by archaic social stereotypes.
So my question to you guys is...Would you let your son, daughter, brother, sister go to a same-sex school? WHY or WHY NOT?